Site Search

Fixed price project outsourcing, built to hold.

Software project outsourcing on a fixed scope, fixed price, and fixed timeline. A senior, AI-augmented pod delivers fixed-price contract software development against a SOW, engineered to hold. A published Change Control Charter defines what's free, what's flex, what's scope. Acceptance Gates pay milestones, not calendar dates. IP is yours from day 1.

  • 5

    Days Fixed-price proposal if you have a scope
  • 2 weeks

    Discovery Workshop if you don't

  • 15%

    Open-book buffer, on the invoice

  • 10

    Instruments in the Operating System

  • 92%

    On-time delivery, last 24 months

Five things every CTO knows about the fixed price model. No vendor admits.

Fixed-price software development is the most-asked-for fixed-price engagement model. But it is also the most-failed one in software. The reason is almost never the price. It is the operating model around the price. Call it fixed-cost software development, fixed-bid software development, or fixed-budget software development; the label might change, but the failure pattern does not. Below are five truths every engineering leader has lived through. Unified leads with them because the antidotes are the entire reason this page exists.

TRUTH 01

~30%

The hidden buffer

The industry-standard "fixed price" includes a 20-30% contingency padded into the rate, invisible to you, profit to them if the fixed-price IT project goes smoothly. You pay for risk you cannot see.

TRUTH 02

67%

Scope creep, weaponized

Two-thirds of fixed-price software projects end up with more billed via change orders than the original SOW. Change requests stop being a collaboration tool and become a billing model.

TRUTH 03

Sprint 8

Quality cuts at the end

When margin is squeezed, and the calendar is fixed, the variable that gets cut is quality. Testing collapses, docs disappear, the handover sprint becomes a heroics-driven release.

TRUTH 04

3 Wks

Disputes over "done"

Without acceptance criteria written before the sprint, the last three weeks of every fixed-price software project become a Slack war over the definition of "done." Both sides lose.

TRUTH 05

0 wins

The contractor-pays myth

A penalty clause that says, "If anything goes wrong, the contractor has to pay" reads well in a procurement memo. In practice, when a vendor goes underwater, the project also goes underwater. There are no winners on a failing fixed price.

THE UNIFIED POSITION

Every Unified fixed-price engagement model is built around antidotes to these five truths. An open-book buffer instead of a hidden one. A published Change Control Charter instead of a change-order revenue model. Embedded QA instead of quality-as-final-sprint. Acceptance criteria written before sprints, not after. And if we look at your project and the model is wrong, we say so in writing and recommend a Dedicated Pod or Staff Augmentation engagement instead. The rest of this page is the operating model that makes that possible.

Is fixed price the right model for your project?

Fixed price is a precision instrument. It works beautifully on the right outsourced software project and quietly destroys the wrong one. Below is the two-column qualifier we use in every discovery call. Before pricing, before signatures, before anyone gets emotionally invested. If you sit in the right column on most rows, fixed price is the right tool. If you sit in the left, we will recommend Dedicated Pod or Staff Augmentation instead, and we will tell you in the first 30 minutes.

FIXED PRICE, THE RIGHT TOOL

Scope is stable, defined, and acceptance-criteria-able.

If you can say "yes" to most of the seven rows below, your fixed-price custom software development project is a strong candidate. We have shipped hundreds of these.

  • Stable scope. You can describe the end state in a requirements specification without saying, "and then we'll figure out X mid-project."

  • Mature problem. The product, customer, and workflow are well-understood. Not greenfield discovery.

  • Acceptance criteria possible. Each milestone has an observable, testable "done" state.

  • Reasonable horizon. 3 to 9 months end-to-end. Long enough to plan a fixed timeline, short enough to lock.

  • Independent build surface. Few third-party dependencies you cannot control or wait on.

  • Defined non-functional bar. Performance, security, compliance requirements documented upfront.

  • Decision-maker in the room. One product owner who can approve scope, milestones, and acceptance.

Typical Fits: Modernization. Re-Platform. Compliance Build. Enterprise Integration. Migration. MVP Rebuild.

FIXED PRICE, THE WRONG TOOL

Discovery, R&D, or pivots are part of the journey.

If your project sits on the seven rows below, fixed price will hurt you. We will recommend a Dedicated Pod or Staff Augmentation model in the first 30 minutes.

  • Greenfield discovery. You're still finding product-market fit. The right product is unknown until you ship and learn.

  • Heavy R&D. AI experimentation, novel algorithms, evaluation-driven iteration. Outcomes cannot be pre-specified.

  • Pivots expected. Customer feedback, regulatory shifts, or competitive moves will force scope re-thinks mid-project.

  • Long horizon (over 12 months). Anything beyond a year is too long to lock; the world moves underneath you.

  • Third-party dependent. You're waiting on an enterprise partner's API, a vendor's release, a regulator's clarification.

  • Continuous evolution. The product is a platform that needs ongoing engineering capacity, not a project with a finish line.

  • No single product owner. Six stakeholders, no decision-maker. Fixed price assumes one voice.

Better Model: Dedicated Pod Or Staff Augmentation.

Don't have a detailed scope yet? Our Discovery Workshop produces one.

A fixed price needs a fixed scope. If you already have a detailed SOW, RFP, or requirements document, you do not need this. Send it; we return a fixed-price proposal in 5 business days. If you don't have one yet, the 2-week Discovery phase is how Unified produces a buildable artifact: a SOW detailed enough that nothing in the build phase is left to assumption, every project risk is identified, mitigated, and owned, and the effort estimation is accurate enough to underwrite a fixed-price proposal. Paid engagement. 100% credited against the fixed scope software project if you proceed. Yours to keep, shop, or hand to any vendor for outsourced software delivery if you don't.

FOR PROSPECTS WITHOUT A DETAILED SCOPE

Two weeks. A senior squad. A SOW built to be priced.

WEEK 01

DOMAIN IMMERSION

Listen, map, audit, and write it down.

The BA, Solution Architect, and Tech Lead embed with your team for five working days of the discovery phase. Stakeholder interviews, current-state audit, technical archaeology on the existing codebase or systems, integration map, non-functional discovery.

  • 6 to 10 stakeholder interviews (product, engineering, customer success, ops)
  • Current-state architecture audit + dependency map
  • Customer journey mapping for the workflow in scope
  • Non-functional requirements (perf, security, compliance) interview
  • Risk-and-assumption log opened, owners assigned on both sides
WEEK 02

SOLUTION & SOW

Architect, decompose, scope, and price.

The squad converts week-one output into a project blueprint. Solution architecture diagram, defined scope, software project decomposition into milestones, acceptance criteria draft for each, risk register, milestone-paced fixed timeline, and the fixed price proposal itself.

  • Solution architecture diagram + ADRs for key decisions
  • Scope decomposition into 4 to 8 milestone blocks
  • Draft acceptance criteria per milestone (Gherkin-ready)
  • Risk register, open-book, with mitigation owners on both sides
  • Fixed price proposal with milestone-based payment schedule

DURATION

10 working days

SQUAD

BA, SA, Tech Lead

WORKSHOP FORMAT

Hybrid, onsite optional

SOW TURNAROUND

5 business days post-workshop

THE THREE THINGS YOU WALK AWAY WITH

Whether or not you decide to engage Unified for the build, the deliverables the workshop produces are designed to do three things, structurally, every time. Each one is named, owned, and signed off before the SOW is delivered.

01 · Clarity

Nothing left to assumption.

Every workflow, edge case, integration, and non-functional requirement is written down. The SOW carries a glossary; ambiguous nouns become defined terms. Acceptance criteria drafted before kickoff in Gherkin-style given / when / then.

The build phase becomes execution, not interpretation.

02 · Risk

Identified, mitigated, owned.

An open-book risk register with named owners on both sides. Each risk carries a likelihood, an impact, a mitigation path, a contingency plan, and a decision threshold. Assumptions are dated, with confirmation deadlines.

No risk goes silent. No surprise lands in week six.

03 · Estimate

Accurate enough to fix a price against.

The project estimate is broken down by milestone, by role, by week, using three-point PERT estimation and reference class forecasting against our 300+ project archive. Cross-checked by a senior architect outside the workshop.

The fixed price holds because the underlying estimate is real.

WORKSHOP INVESTMENT

Sized to your scope.

Workshop fees are sized to your project's domain, integration topology, and team availability. 100% credited against the fixed-price project if you proceed. Yours to keep if you don't.

Request a workshop quote

ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR RESPONDS WITHIN 24 HOURS

How a number becomes a number you can hold us to.

Most fixed-price quotes are produced the same way: a salesperson looks at the deck, adds 30% to whatever feels right, and emails the number before the prospect cools down. The estimate is a marketing artifact, not an engineering one.
Unified does not work this way. Every fixed-price engagement model proposal is built on a disciplined, builder-led, science-of-software method that turns scope into a number we will stand behind in contract. We follow the same method whether you hire a fixed-price development team for a single build or hire software development on a fixed price across several projects a year.
The method, the principles, and the calibration loop are given below.

We quote based on ensuring project success and quality, not on getting the project.

THE ESTIMATION PRINCIPLE THAT GOVERNS EVERY UNIFIED FIXED PRICE PROPOSAL

PRINCIPLE 01

Builders estimate. Sales presents.

The Tech Lead and Solution Architect hold single point of accountability for every number on the proposal. Sales is not allowed to adjust them downward to win a deal. If the number is wrong, the architect who signed it owns the correction.

Industry default: Sales estimates by gut, builders inherit the consequences.

PRINCIPLE 02

Three-point, never single-point.

Every work package gets best, likely, and worst estimates. PERT-weighted expected value. Standard deviation captured. A single number lies; a three-point estimate tells the truth about uncertainty.

Industry default: One number presented as a measurement.

PRINCIPLE 03

Work packages under 5 days.

If a work package is bigger than a week, it is wrong. We decompose until every estimable unit fits inside a sprint. Big lumps hide risk. Small lumps surface it. The decomposition itself is the first quality gate.

Industry default: "build the dashboard, 4 weeks," with no visibility inside.

PRINCIPLE 04

Reference class over intuition.

Bottom-up estimates are always cross-checked against actuals from our archive of past similar projects. Reference class forecasting catches the systematic optimism that bottom-up estimation cannot see in itself.

Industry default: bottom-up only, with no calibration against history.

PRINCIPLE 05

Uncertainty quantified, not hidden.

The confidence interval lives on the proposal. The Cone of Uncertainty is named and explained. Where uncertainty is high (early discovery, novel integration), we say so. We do not paper over with a bigger buffer.

Industry default: a single point estimate with a hidden 30% pad.

PRINCIPLE 06

Non-functional work explicitly scoped.

Testing, observability, security review, documentation, UAT support, and handover get their own line items with their own estimates. They are not assumed to be free, and they are not skipped at the end of the project to save margin.

Industry default: NFRs treated as overhead, cut first when calendar tightens.

PRINCIPLE 07

Assumptions ledgered, owned, dated.

Every assumption baked into the estimate is logged in the Assumption Ledger with a confidence level, an owner, and a date by which it must be confirmed. Assumptions that fail before that date trigger a transparent re-estimate. No surprises in week eight.

Industry default: assumptions buried in the SOW prose, surfaced only when something breaks.

PRINCIPLE 08

Calibrated quarterly against actuals.

Every estimate is logged at SOW lock. Actual hours are logged throughout delivery. Variance is computed at project close. Heuristics are recalibrated every quarter. Our estimates today are measurably more accurate than they were a year ago.

Industry default: estimate, forget, repeat. No learning loop.

ESTIMATE-TO-ACTUAL VARIANCE

7.4% average

Across the last 18 fixed-price projects, the average variance between the bottom-up estimate at SOW lock and the actual delivered hours.

ON-TIME DELIVERY

92%

Last 24 months. The estimate held because the method held. The remaining 8% triggered a Phase Exit Ramp or a Change Charter re-scope, never a silent overrun.

REFERENCE CLASS ARCHIVE

300+ projects

Past shipped engagements logged with actuals, used as the calibration set for every new estimate by domain, stack, and compliance envelope.

CALIBRATION CADENCE

Quarterly

Estimation heuristics reviewed and adjusted every 90 days. Senior architects own the calibration log. Variance trends published internally.

Ten instruments. Contractual. Active from SOW lock.

Every Unified fixed-price engagement runs on the same ten-instrument operating system, built for vendor accountability and risk transfer. Not best-effort. Not aspirational. Each one is written into the SOW or the MSA, with an owner, a cadence, and an artifact attached. The instruments exist because they are the antidotes to the five truths in section 01. They are also the reason our last 24-month on-time delivery rate is 92%.

01

INSTRUMENT 01

SOW before everything

No fixed price without a detailed SOW. If you arrive with one, we lock it. If you don't, the 2-week Discovery Workshop produces it. Either way, scope is countersigned, acceptance criteria are written, and the proposal is built on a real estimate, not a vendor's gut.

02

INSTRUMENT 02

SOW Lock ceremony with named owners

A signed scope-freeze ceremony at the end of the workshop. Every milestone has a named owner on both sides. The SOW becomes a single source of truth, referenced in every change request, every demo, every dispute.

03

INSTRUMENT 03

Open-Book Buffer shown on the invoice

The 15% contingency line lives on the proposal and the invoice, not behind them. If we do not consume it, we credit half back at project close. If we consume past it, we eat the variance. Skin in the game, in writing.

04

INSTRUMENT 04

Acceptance Criteria written before the sprint

Every milestone has Gherkin-style "given / when / then" acceptance criteria signed off before the sprint starts, not negotiated after it ends. Removes 90% of the "is this done?" arguments that haunt fixed-price projects.

05

INSTRUMENT 05

Acceptance Gates pay milestones, not dates

Payment is triggered by your sign-off on the milestone's acceptance criteria, not by a calendar date. If we miss the criteria, the gate does not open. If we miss the date but pass the criteria, the gate still opens.

06

INSTRUMENT 06

Change Control Charter published, not hidden

A four-tier change-request protocol in the SOW. Some changes are free. Some come with a documented flex pool. Some are scope additions with a transparent quote. No more "everything is a change order" surprise.

07

INSTRUMENT 07

Phase Exit Ramps, two-way, no penalty

At the end of each phase, both sides have an exit ramp with no penalty, no claw-back, full handover. If we are wrong for each other, the worst case is "we wasted one phase," not "we lose six months."

08

INSTRUMENT 08

Embedded QA from sprint one

Test automation, regression coverage, performance benchmarks, security scans on every PR, from day one of the build, not the final sprint. Quality cannot be the variable when the calendar and the price are fixed.

09

INSTRUMENT 09

Weekly demo with working software

Every Friday. Working software. Not slides. Not "we're 60% done." If a demo cannot show the milestone moving, the milestone is not moving. Two consecutive misses triggers a no-fault exit ramp.

10

INSTRUMENT 10

IP yours from day one

All IP, source, configurations, infrastructure-as-code, runbooks, ADRs, and Glass Box AI Policy artifacts are assigned to your entity at signature. Code escrow available. No retained background IP. No derivatives clause.

How a Unified fixed price project actually moves.

Every Unified fixed price engagement runs through the same six phases. Each phase has a named owner, a calendar window, a deliverable artifact, and an Acceptance Gate that pays the next milestone. A Phase Exit Ramp opens at every gate. Either side can step off, no penalty. This is the lifecycle you would see in your SOW on signature day.

PHASE 01 · SCOPE CONFIRMATION

[5 DAYS, OR 2 WEEKS]

Confirm. Architect. SOW.

Two paths in. If you arrive with a detailed SOW, RFP, or requirements specification, we review it in 5 business days and return the proposal. If you don't, the 2-week Discovery Workshop produces the SOW from a senior squad of a BA, Solution Architect, and Tech Lead.

  • If SOW exists: 5-day review, gap-flag, fixed-price proposal
  • If no SOW: Discovery Workshop, 100% credited if project proceeds
  • Either way: architecture diagram, milestones, acceptance criteria draft
  • Either way: open-book risk register with owners on both sides

ACCEPTANCE GATE Signed SOW, fixed price proposal, milestone schedule

Phase 02 · SOW Lock + Mobilize

[1 week]

Sign. Staff. Schedule.

SOW Lock ceremony. Both sides countersign scope, milestones, acceptance criteria, Change Control Charter, and the Open-Book Buffer line. Pod composed and assigned.

  • SOW + MSA + Charter countersigned
  • Named pod assigned, resumes shared
  • Acceptance Gate schedule published
  • 30% milestone payment released

ACCEPTANCE GATE Locked SOW, named pod, payment milestone 1 released

Phase 03 · Foundation

[2-4 weeks]

Build the rails.

Architecture instantiated, environments provisioned, CI/CD wired, observability seeded, security baselines set. Embedded QA online from day one of code. First demo at end of phase.

  • Repos, environments, CI/CD live
  • ADRs ratified, architecture documented
  • QA + DevOps + observability scaffold
  • First working-software demo

ACCEPTANCE GATE Foundation demo, architecture sign-off, exit ramp open

Phase 04 · Build / Milestones

[8-24 weeks]

Ship. Demo. Accept. Repeat.

Four to eight milestones, each with pre-written acceptance criteria. Weekly working-software demos. Change Control Charter governs all scope movement. Open-Book Buffer consumption tracked weekly.

  • 4-8 milestone blocks, each Acceptance-Gated
  • Weekly working demo + monthly steer-co
  • Change Charter logs every scope movement
  • Glass Box dashboard: scope, buffer, risk

ACCEPTANCE GATE Each milestone passes its acceptance criteria; payment released

Phase 05 · Hardening & UAT

[2-4 weeks]

Stress. Audit. Polish.

Performance testing, security review, accessibility audit, user acceptance testing with your real customers. Bugs triaged by the acceptance criteria. Anything that violates a documented criterion is fixed under contract.

  • Performance + load testing to NFR targets
  • Security review + penetration test (where in scope)
  • UAT with named customer testers
  • Bug triage against documented acceptance criteria

ACCEPTANCE GATE UAT sign-off, NFR targets met, security review clean

Phase 06 · Transition & Handover

[1-2 weeks]

Hand over. Train. Close.

Runbooks, on-call playbooks, ADR set, observability tour, training sessions for your team. Open-Book Buffer reconciliation. If buffer was not consumed, 50% credited back. Final invoice. Clean project sign-off.

  • Runbooks + on-call playbooks delivered
  • 2-4 training sessions with your team
  • 30-day post-launch warranty active
  • Open-Book Buffer reconciliation + credit

ACCEPTANCE GATE Final acceptance, project close, buffer credit issued

Six risks every fixed price project carries. Six instruments that own them.

Most vendors hide the risk register in the buffer. Unified publishes it. Below are six risks that exist on every fixed-price project, the ones experienced engineering leaders ask about in the first call. For each, the instrument from the Operating System that owns it, and the outcome you can actually defend to your CFO. The risk register lives next to the SOW in your data room from day one.

01 RISK - WHAT EVERY FP PROJECT CARRIES
02 UNIFIED’S INSTRUMENT
03 OUTCOME YOU CAN DEFEND

Scope ambiguity at sign-off

IMPACT HIGH · PROBABILITY HIGH

The SOW reads well in the conference room. In sprint three, two sentences mean three different things to three different people.

Acceptance Criteria written before the sprint. Every milestone has Gherkin-style given/when/then criteria signed off before kickoff. The SOW carries a glossary; ambiguous nouns become defined terms. Workshop output enforced via SOW Lock.

Zero "is-it-done" disputes. Every milestone closes on a written, pre-signed standard. Your CFO sees an audit trail of what was promised vs. what was accepted.

Scope creep weaponized as change orders

IMPACT HIGH · PROBABILITY HIGH

Two-thirds of fixed-price projects end up billing more in change orders than the original SOW. Change becomes a billing model.

Change Control Charter, four-tier, published. Clarifications and styling tweaks are free. A flex pool covers ~10% of small scope movements. Net-new scope gets a transparent quote with a one-week turnaround. No more silent reclassification.

Change orders below 8% of original SOW on the last 18 engagements. Industry benchmark is 60-80%. The Charter is auditable, line by line.

Buffer padding hidden in the rate

IMPACT · MEDIUM · PROBABILITY · UNIVERSAL

The standard industry buffer is 20-30%, baked into the rate, invisible to you. Profit to the vendor if the project goes smoothly.

Open-Book Buffer, 15%, shown on the invoice. The contingency line is a separate line item on the proposal and the invoice. Unconsumed buffer is reconciled at project close. 50% credited back to you. Consumed-past-buffer is on us.

Visible price formation. Your CFO sees engineering, management, QA, PM, and buffer as separate lines. Auditable. Defensible. No "trust us" line items.

Quality cuts in the final sprint

IMPACT · SEVERE · PROBABILITY · HIGH

When margin is squeezed and the calendar is fixed, the variable cut is quality. Testing collapses. Docs disappear. The last sprint is heroics.

Embedded QA from sprint one. Test automation, regression coverage, perf benchmarks, security scans on every PR from day one of the build. QA capacity is a fixed line in the bill of materials. It cannot be quietly reallocated.

92% on-time delivery with full test coverage, last 24 months. Quality is a constraint, not a variable.

Vendor underwater, project sinks with it

IMPACT · SEVERE · PROBABILITY · MEDIUM

"Contractor pays if anything goes wrong" reads well in procurement. In practice, when a vendor goes underwater, your project goes with it.

Phase Exit Ramps, two-way, no penalty. At every Acceptance Gate, either side can step off. Worst case: one phase lost, full handover, runbooks and code yours. No hostage clauses. Combined with the Open-Book Buffer model.

Bounded downside. Your maximum exposure is one phase, not the whole project. Legal team has reviewed the clause; it is in plain language.

Third-party dependency slips the timeline

IMPACT · MEDIUM · PROBABILITY · HIGH

A vendor API change, a regulator's clarification, a partner's release schedule, and the calendar moves through no fault of either of us.

Risk register publishes third-party dependencies upfront. Each one named, with an owner on your side, with a slip-impact analysis. SOW carves out "external-dependency" milestones with a renegotiation trigger, not a billing trigger.

No third-party surprise. Your CFO sees the dependency map at SOW lock. Slips are renegotiated, not weaponized.

What is free. What is flex. What is scope. Published in the SOW.

The Change Control Charter is the single most important document in a fixed price project. Most vendors hide it inside the MSA. We publish it on this page. Four tiers of change, three columns of governance: what it is, how it moves through the system, what it costs. The Charter lives in the SOW, not the email thread.

CHANGE TYPE
PROCESS & CADENCE
COST IMPACT

Tier 01 · Clarifications

Free

e.g. "Make the error message friendlier." "The accept button should be primary, not secondary." Edge case clarification that lives inside the existing acceptance criterion.

Captured as a clarification note on the milestone. Engineer makes the call in the next PR. No process overhead. No approval needed. No paper.

0$ Bundled into the milestone.

We assume some clarifications in every sprint.

Tier 02 · Flex Pool

FLEX

e.g., "We need a dark-mode variant of the dashboard." "Add a CSV export to the report module." Small, well-scoped additions within the milestone's spirit.

EM logs against the flex pool. Confirmed in the next weekly demo. Pool is ~10% of milestone effort, sized at SOW lock. Visible to you in the Glass Box dashboard.

0$ from the flex pool

When the pool is exhausted, further Tier-02 items move to Tier 03 at transparent rates.

Tier 03 · Scope Addition

SCOPE

e.g. "We need a new integration with Stripe Connect." "Add a multi-tenant admin console." Net-new functionality outside the SOW's documented scope.

Change request raised on the form embedded in the dashboard. Costed within 5 business days. You approve or decline in writing. Approved scope is added with its own milestone, acceptance criteria, and payment trigger.

Transparent quote

Same blended rate as the original SOW. Buffer model applies. No partner-rate premium. No "we'll figure it out later."

Tier 04 · Major Pivot

RESET

e.g. "We're pivoting from a B2C to a B2B model." "The compliance regime just changed." Scope changes large enough to invalidate the SOW.

Triggers a one-week mini-workshop to re-scope. Existing SOW pauses; Phase Exit Ramp opens. Either side can step off. If we continue, a new SOW is issued. The original buffer reconciles at the pause point.

Re-priced

Honest re-quote based on new scope. Workshop fee for the re-scope is creditable against the new SOW.

What is in the price. What is the buffer? What you actually pay for.

Most vendors quote a single number with a 20-30% buffer baked in. Unified does it differently: every fixed-price proposal carries five named line items: engineering, EM and delivery, QA and DevOps, PM and BA, and an open-book buffer. The buffer is 15%, sits on the invoice, and reconciles at close. Below is the typical line composition for a six-month build. Your numbers will move, but the fixed price model’s structure does not.

ENGINEERING

50%

Senior+ FE/BE/AI engineers shipping product. Named, AI-augmented, locked on the engagement.

EM & DELIVERY

15%

Engineering Manager + Engagement Director. Sprint cadence, demos, steer-co, Glass Box reporting.

QA & DEVOPS

12%

Test automation, CI/CD, observability, security scans, performance benchmarks. Embedded from sprint one.

PM & BA

8%

Acceptance criteria authoring, change-request triage, stakeholder coordination, milestone governance.

OPEN-BOOK BUFFER

15%

Contingency, shown on the invoice. Unconsumed buffer reconciles 50% back to you. Over-buffer is on us.

Navigating complex challenges with our digital Success Stories

CS
01

Boosted CX and operational efficiency for a Fortune 50 Media Conglomerate

media

Engineered advanced cloud tech with a client portal for ad analytics & forecasts and an internal tool for budget & strategy.

  • 15%

    Increase in backoffice operational efficiency

  • 60%

    Improvement in customer satisfaction survey

CS
02

SaaS Platform Modernization for a NASDAQ listed Law Transcription Firm

media

Developed AI-driven transcription with real-time diary-ization, boosting accuracy, efficiency, and uptime.

  • 2x

    Growth in new customer acquisition

  • 15%

    Increase in backoffice efficiency

CS
03

Boosted lead conversion by 50% through Website Redesign for a CPA Firm

Cover

Redesigned site, optimizing UI/UX, enhancing navigation, and integrating CTAs, boosting leads by 50%.

  • 50%

    Increase in lead conversion rates

  • 35%

    Improvement in Bounce rates

CS
04

Increased eCommerce sales by 124% for a Tire and Rim Manufacturer

cover picture

Implemented advanced search, seamless checkout, AWS migration, and scalable solutions to enhance performance & UX.

  • 124%

    Growth in sales

  • 60%

    Improvement in cart abandonment rate

Twelve scenarios where fixed price wins.

Each use case below is a real engagement we have shipped through turnkey software development on a fixed-price SOW in the last 18 months. The pattern is the same: bounded scope, mature problem domain, defined non-functional bar. If your situation rhymes with one of these and your scope is detailed, we quote in 5 business days. If your scope still needs definition, the Discovery Workshop closes that gap.

USE CASE 01

MIGRATION

Platform migration with a deadline Salesforce → HubSpot, Heroku → AWS, monolith → microservices. Bounded scope, defined success criteria, clear cutover plan.

DEFINED ENDPOINT · FP WINS

USE CASE 02

COMPLIANCE

SOC 2 / HIPAA / GDPR compliance build Audit pack, access controls, audit logging, data retention, SLA framework. Compliance regimes give you the spec.

SPEC BY REGULATOR · FP WINS

USE CASE 03

ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION

Enterprise customer integration SSO, custom data sync, white-label theming, on-prem deployment package for a single named customer. Scope defined by the customer's contract.

SCOPE = CONTRACT · FP WINS

USE CASE 04

MVP REBUILD

MVP rebuild with known feature set You have a working v0 with product-market fit. You need a production-grade v1 with the same features, better foundations, no surprises.

FEATURES KNOWN · FP WINS

USE CASE 05

RE-PLATFORM

Re-platform to a modern stack WordPress → Next.js, Ruby on Rails → Go, jQuery → React. Functional behavior preserved, technical foundations modernized.

LIKE-FOR-LIKE REBUILD · FP WINS

USE CASE 06

MODULE BUILD

New module in an existing product A reporting suite, a billing module, an admin console. Well-scoped feature surface inside a stable product. Acceptance criteria writable.

BOUNDED FEATURE · FP WINS

USE CASE 07

DATA PIPELINE

Data warehouse + ETL build-out Snowflake/BigQuery + Fivetran/Airbyte + dbt + Looker. Schema known, source systems documented, output dashboards specified.

SCHEMA-DEFINED · FP WINS

USE CASE 08

MOBILE PARITY

Mobile app to feature parity with web iOS + Android app for an existing web product. Feature set defined by the web app. Design system reused. Predictable scope.

SPEC BY MIRROR · FP WINS

USE CASE 09

API PRODUCT

Public API + developer portal RESTful or GraphQL API with documented endpoints, OpenAPI/SDL spec, rate limits, auth model, developer portal, SDKs. Spec is the contract.

OPENAPI = SPEC · FP WINS

USE CASE 10

AI FEATURE

Production AI feature, evals in scope RAG over a known corpus, a defined agent workflow, structured outputs against a documented schema. Eval suite included.

EVALS = ACCEPTANCE · FP WINS

USE CASE 11

WHITE-LABEL

White-label / SDK productization Turning an internal tool into a sellable SDK or white-label product. Documentation, theming, multi-tenancy, packaging.

PRODUCT SURFACE DEFINED · FP WINS

USE CASE 12

ENTERPRISE PORTAL

Enterprise customer portal Account management, billing self-serve, role-based access, audit log, customer-facing observability. Well-trodden surface.

PATTERN-LIBRARY SCOPE · FP WINS

The stack every fixed price project ships on.

Standardised. Documented. Boring on purpose. Every Unified fixed-price project uses the same toolchain family, so the runbook reads the same across engagements, quality assurance is portable, and the outsourced software delivery takes days, not months. Flagship picks are highlighted; if your team prefers a neighbor in the same family, the SOW adapts to yours, not the other way around.

Frontend

Redefine your website frontend with tech stacks that help build smooth user interfaces for seamless user experiences.

Next-JS-White
reactjs
Remix
svelte (1)
Vue.js logo
TypeScript-1 1
tailwindcss-logotype-Colour
shadcn- White
Storybook- White

Backend

Choose the best server-facing tech stacks to improve performance and create exceptional business functionalities.

Node.js
golang logo
python 1
java 1
Ruby_On_Rails_Logo
DotNet
php 1
laravel

Mobile

Ensure the responsiveness and design consistency by choosing from the hand-picked selection of mobile tools and technologies we offer

ReactNative
Swift_White
Flutter 1
Expo- White
android-banner-1
Kotlin_logo_hybrid

Database

Rationalize your data migration by selecting a database that offers you the most in functionality and convenience.

postgresql 1
ClickHouse_Logo_colour
Redis 1
Pineconee_White
Snowflake_Logo
google-big-query-logo
dynamo_db-White
pgvector- white
dbt-white

AI/ML Frameworks

Leverage the given tools and technologies to develop, train, and deploy artificial intelligence and machine learning models effectively.

Claude White
OpenAI-White
langgraph-White
LlamaIndex- white
pydantic-ai-white
huggingface_logo-white
Bedrock White

Cloud

Choose wisely from our cloud tech stack to drive the success, scalability, security, and overall impact of your digital product.

AWS
google-cloud 1
Azure 1
Vercel- Colour
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Cloudflare color logo
fly.io hybrid

DevOps

DevOps is more than a mindset. It involves a precisely coordinated play of tools and technologies that maximize your digital ROI.

GitHub_White
Terraform_hybrid
Kubernetes-Docker 1
pulumi-=hybrid
argocd-coloured

Observability

Shows how systems behave in production with regards to metrics, traces, logs, and errors, so teams can detect issues and quickly find the cause.

Ddata-Dog-Colour 1
OpenTelemetry- White
Grafana_Coloured 1
honeycomb-white
new-relic-Hybrid

Security

Implement comprehensive security measures and data handling compliances to safeguard systems, applications, and data from threats.

Playwright
CyPress_logo
vitest-Hybrid
Vanta-Hybrid
Drata-Hybrid
Snyk_Hybrid
OWASP ZAP- Hybrid

Third-party Integrations

APIs to facilitate communication between software applications.

STRIPE-COLOUR
Twillo
salesforce (1)
HubSpot
OAuth-White
Segment - Hybrid

Collaboration Tools

Streaming teamwork through real-time communication and project management to improve workflows, enhance coordination, and drive results.

34
Linear White
Slack
notion
GitHub_White
Figma-Hybrid
Loom Hybrid

Four reasons your CFO and your CTO read the same proposal and nod. guaranteed delivery software development.

Most fixed-price vendors are good at one thing: the sales cycle. Unified is built around software development with guaranteed delivery. Below are the four structural reasons our last 24 months of fixed-price engagements landed inside the SOW, inside the buffer, and on the calendar. None of these are marketing claims; each has a corresponding instrument in the Operating System (section 04) and the Risk Register (section 06).

REASON 01

Honesty is the moat

1 in 4 fixed price inquiries turn down at the workshop end Workshop SOW yours to keep if FP is wrong Open-Book Buffer on the invoice, not behind it Change Charter published in the SOW, not the email thread

REASON 02

Senior-led, AI-augmented

70% senior+ on every fixed-price pod Every developer with Cursor, Claude, Copilot in IDE Senior architect carried from workshop to handover 250+ engineers, top 10% of the talent market

REASON 03

Track record auditable

92% on-time delivery, last 24 months 2 to 6% change orders, vs industry 60 to 80% Buffer consumption averaged 68% across last 18 projects 15+ years of fixed price engagements, 4.6 Clutch

REASON 04

NYC ownership, global execution

4 to 6-hour overlap with US Eastern, every working day NYC-based Engagement Director on every steer-co Approximately 50% of US premium boutique rates ISO 27001, SOC 2 in progress, IP yours day 1

Fixed Price FAQs

Do we have to do the Discovery Workshop first?

No, not if you already have a detailed scope. If you arrive with a complete SOW, RFP, or requirements document, send it to us, and we return a fixed-price proposal in 5 business days. We'll review it for gaps and flag anything missing, but if the document is buildable as-is, you skip the workshop entirely. The workshop exists for the other case: prospects who have a vision, a deck, a Notion doc, or an investor narrative, but not yet a buildable artifact. In that case, the workshop is how Unified turns rough scope into a SOW with nothing left to assumption, every risk identified and owned, and an estimate accurate enough to underwrite a fixed price.

How is the workshop priced?

Workshop fees are sized to your project's domain, integration topology, and team availability. Senior squad of BA, Solution Architect, and Tech Lead for 10 working days. Paid upfront. 100% credited against the fixed-price project if it proceeds. Yours to keep if it does not: the SOW, the architecture diagram, the risk register, the milestone plan, the proposal. Request a workshop quote on the contact form below, and the Engagement Director returns an exact number within 48 hours of the fit call.

What if you tell us fixed price is not right for our project?

Then we say so in writing at the end of the workshop. The SOW is still yours. We will recommend a Dedicated Pod or Staff Augmentation model based on what we found. No build dollars were spent. We turn down roughly 1 in 4 fixed-price inquiries at the end of the workshop, usually because discovery, R&D, or pivots are part of the journey. Saying no is a feature of this model.

How is the open-book buffer different from the industry standard?

The industry standard is a 20-30% buffer baked invisibly into the rate. Profit to the vendor if the project goes smoothly. Unified shows the buffer as a separate 15% line item on the proposal and the invoice. If we do not consume it, we credit 50% back at close. If we consume past it, we eat the variance. The buffer is auditable. Your CFO can run a line item against it in any monthly review.

How long does a typical fixed-price project take?

12-36 weeks end-to-end is the sweet spot. Below 12 weeks, the workshop overhead is a higher proportion of the project (we will sometimes pre-discount the workshop in that case). Above 36 weeks, the world moves underneath you. We will usually recommend either splitting into two SOWs back-to-back or moving to a Dedicated Pod model. The longest fixed price project we have shipped was 11 months. The shortest was 6 weeks.

What if our requirements change mid-project?

The Change Control Charter handles it. Four tiers: clarifications are free, flex pool covers small additions, scope additions get a transparent quote, pivots trigger a re-scope. Most projects see 2-6% change orders against the original SOW, well below the industry's 60-80%. The Charter lives in the SOW, not the email thread. Change is welcomed, not weaponized.

Who is on the team during the build phase?

A named pod sized to the SOW. Typically 4-10 people: a senior architect carried over from the workshop, senior engineers (FE / BE / AI), a QA engineer, a DevOps engineer, an Engineering Manager, and a Product Engineer. Resumes shared at SOW lock. Same anti-rotation clause as the Dedicated Pod page. Substitutions need your written approval with a 60-day overlap.

How are payments structured?

Payments are milestone-paced and Acceptance-Gate-triggered. Typical schedule: workshop fee upfront (credited), 25-30% at SOW lock + Foundation, 40-50% across the build milestones (paid per Acceptance Gate), 15-20% at UAT sign-off + Transition. No calendar-based billing. The milestones move payment, not the calendar. Invoices reconcile against the open-book buffer at close.

Is there a warranty after launch?

Yes. 30-day warranty period of post-launch support on any defect that violates a documented acceptance criterion. Fixes are unbilled within that window. Beyond 30 days, the natural next step is usually a small Dedicated Pod or a maintenance retainer, with no obligation. The 30-day warranty is in the SOW, not contingent on a follow-on engagement.

What if we want to compare your quote to another vendor?

Encouraged. The workshop SOW is yours; if you choose to shop it, send it to other vendors and ask them to quote against the same scope. Most vendors will not produce a SOW at this level of clarity even after they win the business, which is exactly why we lead with it. If a cheaper vendor wins on price, we ask one favor: come back after the project and tell us how the buffer-pad turned out. We learn something either way.

Get a fixed price proposal. Two ways in.

30-minute fit call first to confirm scope, qualification, and the right entry point. If your scope is ready, we quote in 5 business days. If your scope still needs definition, the Discovery Workshop is scheduled, the squad is named, and the fee is invoiced. Either path starts with the same fit call.

NDA on request. The Team Composition Blueprint is yours to keep, with or without engagement. No follow-up sales call required.

RECENT FIXED PRICE PROJECTS

  • FinTech · SOC 2 + PCI-DSS 14w · 62% buffer · 0 scope adds
  • SaaS · Rails → Go re-platform 24w · zero downtime · 1 Tier-03 change
  • LegalTech · RAG over case law 11w · 92% citation precision
  • HealthTech · HIPAA v1 rebuild 20w · 68% buffer · 3 enterprise wins
  • API Product · OpenAPI launch 10w · 71% buffer · 0 scope adds

Start with a 30-min fit call

    • Need to scale beyond hiring cycle
    • Need senior specialists we cannot hire
    • Need a full dedicated pod
    • Need to replace an underperforming vendor
    • Other
    0/4000 characters
    Please answer this to continue