Reach out, we'd love to hear from you!
Do you think about scalability when building a web app? You are usually more bothered with “How do I get this to work?” than with scalability. Well, it’s completely understandable!
But here’s the reality: good apps grow fast. They might have started out as a side project with a couple of screens and a handful of users. Soon, you will experience thousands of sign-ups and demands for new features that will stress out your entire system. So, let’s be futuristic and positive about experiencing growth and build the app for scalability.
Building scalable web applications cannot be an afterthought. You have to integrate it within your web development strategy from the very beginning. And ReactJS can convert this strategic need into live action. Let’s explore how to build scalable web apps with ReactJS in some detail.
Key Takeaways: • Plan for scalability from the beginning. • Use feature-based architecture. • Separate smart (logic) and dumb (UI) components. • Adopt TypeScript early. • Design consistent, cache-friendly APIs. • Choose the right state management (React Query, Redux, or lightweight alternatives). • Maintain clean code with standards and documentation. |
Scalability is often not given the importance it deserves. Most think of it as some omnipresent factor that will miraculously appear when its need arises. But this mistake can cost them millions because scalability is not just about handling more users. It is also about adapting gracefully as the app evolves.
And scalable web development rests firmly on the shoulders of three critical metrics:
Your app needs to be fast and responsive; any delay above 3 seconds will result in increased bounce rates. And nothing messes with an app’s performance more than a messy codebase. Also, with client requirements constantly evolving, apps must learn to adapt to them without rewrites or regressions.
Nothing achieves these objectives better than a scalable ReactJS architecture. It ensures these metrics, making scalability a multiplier for developer productivity, user experience, and business growth.
React is a frontend library, but its use is not limited to building user interfaces. Top web app development service providers extensively use ReactJS to enable safe change at scale. Let’s explore the ReactJS best practices that make it so conducive to building fast ReactJS web apps.
Start with a blueprint. Design with scale in mind to future-proof your app. It will prevent your apps from buckling under load when you add new features, new users, and new requirements. Adopt the following practices from the start:
Flat structures like /components, /utils, /services seem fine at first. But as the app grows, you’ll spend more time searching for related pieces than building features. Use a feature-based architecture instead of the usual /components, /utils, /services to prevent spending time on searching for related pieces.
Let’s write a small code as a sample.
/src
/features
/dashboard
Dashboard.tsx
dashboard.api.ts
dashboard.slice.ts
dashboard.test.tsx
/shared
/components
/lib
So if you’re building a new dashboard feature, you know exactly where all the parts are instead of searching for them blindly. This is very useful when dozens of features exist.
Static typing is essential when integrating scalability in React applications because it helps you to:
Web development companies that skip TypeScript early have to provide rewrites later. This is painful since by then the codebase balloons past 50k lines. At Unified Infotech, we make it mandatory for our developers to use TypeScript right from the initiation of the project.
Scalable apps rely on a clean and consistent codebase. Setting standards early prevents tech debt and keeps the repo maintainable as teams grow. So, implement the following:
Also, for imports and aliases, instead of:
import Button from '../../../shared/components/Button';
Use:
import Button from '@/shared/components/Button';
Refactoring becomes easy, and it also keeps imports clean across a large repo.
Teams change, and then it becomes difficult for newcomers to understand the React App blueprint. So, document everything, including:
Once the blueprint is in place, the next step is shaping the data layer. A scalable frontend can only exist if its backend and APIs are designed for resilience and predictable performance.
Your React frontend’s scalability depends on the API feeding it. You can virtualize lists and split bundles all day, but any delay in your API call response and your UX suffers. To ensure your React code performs seamlessly, you have to design your backend for predictable latency, resilience, and future-proofing.
Pick the right API type to ensure your ReactJS frontend and backend perform seamlessly. Both REST (Representational State Transfer) and GraphQL offer unique strengths and trade-offs. Understand their differences to choose one that handles your data properly.
The table below highlights the key differences between REST and GraphQL to help in your decision-making.
REST vs GraphQL: Key Differences | ||
Aspect | REST | GraphQL |
Data Fetching | Multiple endpoints, each returning fixed data structures | Single endpoint, client specifies exactly what data is needed |
Over-fetching | Common (extra/unnecessary data returned) | Avoided (fetch only requested fields) |
Under-fetching | Common (may require multiple requests to get related data) | Avoided (query can fetch all needed data in one request) |
Endpoints | Many endpoints (e.g., /users, /users/{id}, /posts) | Single endpoint (usually /graphql) |
Request Structure | Fixed (HTTP methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) | Flexible (queries, mutations, subscriptions) |
Versioning | Often requires new versions of API (/v1/, /v2/) | No versioning needed; schema evolves while clients query what they need |
Performance | May require multiple round-trips | Optimized (fetch all in one query) but queries can be expensive if unoptimized |
Caching | Integrates well with HTTP caching | More complex; requires custom caching frameworks like URQL or Apollo |
Tooling | Mature ecosystem (Postman, Swagger/OpenAPI, etc.) | Growing ecosystem (Apollo, Relay, GraphiQL, etc.) |
Use Case Fit | Simple, CRUD-style APIs; standard web services | Complex data relationships; mobile apps; when efficiency matters |
Design APIs to be predictable because consistent patterns reduce confusion for frontend developers. This approach will also cut down on bugs across teams.
Key practices include:
This will help lower the cognitive load for frontend developers, making it easier to build features quickly and keep miscommunications to a minimum.
As APIs evolve, breaking changes are inevitable, but this should not come as a surprise to your frontend ReactJS developers. To keep things seamless, you must:
Caching augments scalability by reducing load on servers and improving performance. Implement caching at each layer. For example, use:
This will cut down the response time and keep the costs under control.
Scaling also deals with protecting your backend and your users when things go wrong. Make your ReactJS app resilient by including:
Integrate the following best practices to ensure constant API monitoring. This will help you to predict, diagnose, and resolve API issues as you scale.
With APIs structured, the question becomes: how should the app consume and manage that data consistently? This is where state management strategy plays a critical role.
State management is critical to building a scalable React app. Get it wrong, and your React app development will experience “state sprawl.” In layman’s terms, if you have five different state solutions tangled together, you’ll create chaos. So document your strategy early to unlock maintainability, predictable data flow, and fearless feature development.
React’s built-in useState and useReducer are lightweight, scoped, easy to debug, and perfect for simple UI interactions like:
Here’s a sample code.
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0);
return (
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Count: {count}
</button>
);
}
The Context API is great for stable, low-frequency values of the ReactJS scalable UI design, like:
But frequently changing data into context tends to re-render storms. So split contexts by concern using AuthContext, ThemeContext, and LocaleContext instead of depending on one “global everything context.”
const ThemeContext = React.createContext({ theme: "light", setTheme: () => {} });
React Query helps treat server data as cache, not state. Benefits you gain because of this include:
Sample Code: Fetching with React Query
import { useQuery, useMutation, useQueryClient } from '@tanstack/react-query';
function ProductList() {
const { data, isLoading, error } = useQuery(['products'], () =>
fetch('/api/products').then(res => res.json())
);
if (isLoading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Something went wrong</p>;
return (
<ul>
{data.map((p: any) => <li key={p.id}>{p.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
// Mutation example
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
const mutation = useMutation(addProduct, {
onSuccess: () => queryClient.invalidateQueries(['products']),
});
The separation of the UI and server state prevents confusion and improves scalability.
As the global state grows in complexity, opt for the Redux Toolkit. It helps by allowing for:
Redux is often criticized as “too much boilerplate,” but it is still a time-tested alternative for complex and large apps where multiple teams need shared, auditable state.
But not every app needs Redux-level structure. Sometimes libraries like Zustand work effectively by offering a middle ground. In fact, Zustand, Recoil, or Jotai are known to work well for mid-sized apps. They also work for isolated modules where Redux would feel heavy-handed.
Redux vs Zustand vs Recoil vs Context API | |||
Tool | Best For | Pros | Cons |
Redux Toolkit | Large apps, teams | Mature, DevTools, predictable | More setup, steeper curve |
Zustand | Small–mid apps | Minimal, fast, simple | Less ecosystem, basic tooling |
Recoil | Complex UI graphs | Derived state, async built-in | Experimental, less mature |
Context API | Stable globals (theme, auth) | Built-in, zero setup | Re-render storms if overused |
React gives you the right primitives to enable scalability, like components, predictable data flow, and a deep ecosystem. But to maximize their benefits, you must use them properly. Features will grow, teams will change, traffic will spike, and roadmaps will shift. Apps that scale gracefully are the ones designed to embrace change without drama.
Yes, but only with the right guardrails. Use Next.js and TypeScript, keep server state in React Query/RTK Query, and reserve Redux Toolkit for complex shared client state.
Takeaway: React scales when architecture and operations do.
Keep API data out of your client store and in React Query/RTK Query. Use Zustand for lightweight global UI state; choose Redux Toolkit when multiple teams need auditable shared state and DevTools.
Takeaway: Pick the smallest tool that satisfies team/complexity.
SSR helps public, content-heavy pages by serving HTML immediately to crawlers. For dashboards, a hybrid (SSG/ISR + RSC/streaming) with strong Core Web Vitals often works better.
Takeaway: Match rendering to the page type.
No, REST scales well with good pagination, filtering, and caching. Choose GraphQL when many clients need flexible shapes or you’re battling over-/under-fetching.
Takeaway: Let client diversity drive the choice.
Track LCP, INP, and CLS on the front end and P95 latency + error rate on the back end. Start with simple SLOs (e.g., LCP ≤ 2.5 s, API P95 ≤ 400 ms) and alert on repeated breaches.
Takeaway: Measure the user journey end-to-end.